wps

特鲁多：特朗普提出“把加拿大并入美国”时，我建议用佛蒙特州或加州交换_我的网站

假扮女佣

A | New Delhi, Oct 13 (UNI) A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a split verdict in the Hijab ban case, and referred the matter to the Chief Justice's (CJI) court for his direction to constitute a larger bench to decide the issue.

The bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia delivered the verdict on a batch of appeals against the Karnataka High Court judgment upholding the hijab ban in educational institutions.

"We have divergent of opinion, I have framed 11 questions on the issue," Justice Hemant Gupta who led the bench said in hiss verdict.

While dismissing the batch of appeals filed by many students, Justice Gupta affirmed the high court's order on the hijab ban and said, "the matter be sent to the CJI for constituting a larger bench to hear the case."

The two-judge bench on September 26, had reserved its order, after hearing from all the parties -- 23 petitioners, their lawyers, and the Karnataka government for a marathon 10 days.

The apex court pronounced the verdict on 23 petitions, including that of, Aishat Shifa, and others.

The state government has argued in the Supreme Court that it had the authority to issue an order to educational institutions to follow the discipline of wearing the prescribed school uniforms.

Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the students/ petitioners, argued that fundamental rights, freedom to choose to what to wear and freedom of faith would not diminish inside a classroom.

The lawyers for the students -- Devadatt Kamat, Dr Rajeev Dhavan amd Dishyant Dave -- submitted in the top court that the Karnataka State government had not presented even a single shred of evidence to support their claim that a few students wearing hijab to their classrooms in addition to their respective uniforms violated public order, health and morality.

The lawyers further said that the Karnataka government had not provide any material to support their claim that wearing hijab infringed on the fundamental rights of other students.

A Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice J M Khazi, in their judgement on March 15, this year, held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam.

The high courts's three-judge bench, had dismissed the petitions filed by a group of Muslim girl students against PU government college for denying them entry while wearing Hijab.

The led by Chief Justice Awasthi dismissed the petition stating that the practice of hijab is not an essential practice under islam and thus does not fall within the ambit of Article 25 of the Constitution of India.

The High court had also held that prescription of school uniform is only a reasonable restriction which is constitutionally permissible which the students cannot object to and stated that the government had the power to issue such notification and that no case was made out against the government notification.

UNI SM ING。来源：环球网视频加载中...【环球网报道】美国当选总统特朗普近期多次发表“把加拿大并入美国”有关言论，引发关注。

B | 据美国全国广播公司（NBC）当地时间9日报道，加拿大总理特鲁多在接受美媒采访时称，特朗普曾在一次交谈中向他提出“把加拿大并入美国”提议，他就此向前者建议，用美国佛蒙特州或加利福尼亚州进行交换。NBC称，特鲁多在接受美国媒体MSNBC一档节目采访时，谈及自己去年11月在海湖庄园与特朗普会晤。报道说，对于特朗普对“把加拿大并入美国”表现出兴趣，特鲁多在采访中称，“当我开始建议说，‘好吧，也许可以用佛蒙特州或加利福尼亚州交换某些地区’，他立马觉得这个话题不再那么有趣。然后我们就转到另一个话题了”。NBC称，特鲁多当时是“开玩笑”提出了这一建议。

C | 特鲁多（左）接受MSNBC采访时的画面图源：MSNBC视频截图NBC称，对于上述消息，特朗普的发言人没有立即回应置评请求。报道说，特鲁多还在采访中称，如果特朗普继续推进关税计划，加拿大准备作出“强有力回应”。此前，特朗普威胁要对加拿大商品征收25%的关税。据NBC等媒体报道，特朗普近期多次发表“加拿大应该成为美国第51州”有关言论，引发加拿大方面不满。特朗普本月7日在佛罗里达州海湖庄园举行的新闻发布会上称，他对使用“经济力量”收购加拿大持开放态度。对此，特鲁多在社交媒体上称，“加拿大不可能成为美国一部分”。

Current article:http://ab3x1.cuntoujuefourantapai.cfd/yvz/gbe7.html

Published on:06:40:27